Cisco Catalyst 4500 1300 Watt AC Power Supply
Mfg # PWR-C45-1300ACV
CDW # 1301114
| UNSPSC 39121004
Know your gear
Features:
Designed for switches that provide inline power
NEMA 5-20 Plug
Inline power up to 800watts- Up to 199 phones with Inline power (this number is based on redundant power supplies)
Input Current -17.6A maximum @ 100VAC 8.8A maximum @ 200VAC
Output Current (Data) - 12V @ 84.7A maximum
KVA rating - 1.76 KVA
Output Power - Up to 1000W + 40W (fan) per power supply (data + voice max = 1300W)
Heat Dissipation -1557 BTU/Hr.
Designed for switches that provide inline power
NEMA 5-20 Plug
Inline power up to 800watts- Up to 199 phones with Inline power (this number is based on redundant power supplies)
Input Current -17.6A maximum @ 100VAC 8.8A maximum @ 200VAC
Output Current (Data) - 12V @ 84.7A maximum
KVA rating - 1.76 KVA
Output Power - Up to 1000W + 40W (fan) per power supply (data + voice max = 1300W)
Heat Dissipation -1557 BTU/Hr.
Enhance your purchase
Cisco Catalyst 4500 1300 Watt AC Power Supply is rated4.67 out of5 by3.
Rated 5 out of 5 byRalf Richter from DNA is a very good way to do the configuration of all the equipmentWhat is our primary use case?* Collecting Clients in the floors.* Concentrate distribution and to forward over routers to other parts.* Fiber and copper ports with enhanced power over Ethernet and stacks.* NM-modules with 10GHow has it helped my organization?* Good and stable operational experience with nearly no loss of hardware and very few software bugs.* Plug and play works now.* DNA is a very good way to do the configuration of all the equipment.What is most valuable?DNA Center is very interesting in automating the setup and monitoring as with each occurrence it gets easier to troubleshoot and provides an impression about what could be the problem.What needs improvement?Location of customers to connect clients to the servers and transport the data and VoIP in parallel with QoS and NBAR with 802.1X.For how long have I used the solution?More than five years.Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2018-03-01T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 bySimon Chaba from Modules are hot swappable, as you have dual power supplies. If you need improvements, you'll need to upgrade the hardware.Valuable FeaturesSupport for various dynamic IP routing protocols and the ability to slot in additional modules while the switch is running.Improvements to My OrganizationModules are hot swappable, as you have dual power supplies, as well as support for various dynamic IP routing protocols.Room for ImprovementNothing that I can think of. If you want to improve, you have the choice to upgrade the hardware.Use of SolutionI've used it for four years.Deployment IssuesNo issues encountered.Stability IssuesIt's been very stable since deployment.Scalability IssuesIt's very scalable, as you just need to buy new modules, and slot them in as and when required.Customer Service and Technical SupportCustomer Service: Excellent customer service.Technical Support: I never had an issue yet with this product which required TAC intervention but from my previous experience Cisco TAC support is the best.Previous SolutionsWe previously used 3com switches, and we switched to Cisco in order to standardize our network hardware.Initial SetupIt's easy to deploy if you know what you are doing, and do proper planning. For me, it was pretty straightforward. I have years of experience on Cisco products.Implementation TeamIt was an in-house deployment.ROIIt's high.Pricing, Setup Cost and LicensingIt's worth the price you pay.Other Solutions ConsideredWe considered using Cisco 3700 series switches and stacking them.Other AdviceIt's best for access layer deployment.Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2015-07-07T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byreviewer780981 from Easy to deploy but they should maximize the number of portsWhat is most valuable?The hardware is rugged. We use it for the basic configuration.What needs improvement?Cisco has a layer three rugged switch. I don't know if they have it. The one I use is layer 2 only. Cisco should provide field switches, outdoor switches that have the capability for layer 3.We've had hardware problems like SSDS, ports, networking, things like that.They should maximize the number of ports. For me, that's important because we have some sites that the industrial switches lack ports so we have to install two industrial switches.For how long have I used the solution?I have been using this solution for two years.What do I think about the stability of the solution?Stability is okay.What do I think about the scalability of the solution?We have around 500 switches deployed in one network.How are customer service and technical support?We haven't needed to contact their technical support.How was the initial setup?It's easy to deploy, just copy and paste. Installing the switches and configuring it, it takes only less than an hour. Installing the fibers takes time.What other advice do I have?My advice to someone considering this solution would be to have a good plan and a good design. It will go smoothly if you have a good design and a good plan. It's important.I would rate it a seven out of ten. Not a ten because Mellanox is better compared to Ethernet switches.Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2019-10-23T00:00:00-04:00